Posts Tagged news

Great Way To Get More Efficient Solar Power for Batteries

College of southern California experts show us a more efficient use of graphene solar panels

Could you imagine people powering their cellular phone or music/video device while jogging on a sunny day?

A University of Southern California team has produced flexible transparent carbon atom films that may have great potential for a brand new variety of solar cells.

In a paper recently published by the journal ACS Nano, researchers stated that organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells have been proposed as a technique to achieve cheap energy due to their ease of manufacture, light weight, and compatibility with flexible substrates.

The new work indicates that graphene, an extremely conductive and highly transparent kind of carbon composed of atoms-thick sheets of carbon atoms, has high possibility to fill this role.

While graphene’s existence has been known for decades, it has only been studied extensively since 2004 because of the impossibility of manufacturing it in high quality and quantity.

The University of southern California team has produced graphene/polymer sheets ranging in sizes approximately 150 square centimeters that in turn can be used to create dense arrays of flexible organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells.

These organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices convert solar radiation to electricity, but not as efficiently as silicon cells.

The power provided by sunlight on a sunny day is approximately 1,000 watts per meter square, for every 1,000 watts of sunlight that hits a square meter part of the standard silicon solar cell, 14 watts of electricity will be generated, Organic solar cells are less efficient; their conversion rate for that same 1,000 watts of sunlight in the graphene-based solar cell would be only 1.3 watts.

But what graphene organic photovoltaic (OPV) lack in efficiency, can potentially be compensated by its lower price and, greater physical flexibility.

Researchers think it can eventually be possible to cover with inexpensive solar cell layers extensive areas like newspapers, magazines or power generating clothing.

In the meanwhile Prof. Ruoff and his colleagues of the mechanical engineering department at the University of Texas at Austin, are studying the basic science in the development of graphene-based ultracapacitors for usage in electronics and other fields.

Prof. Ruoff says batteries are relatively slow, they can store energy but take a while to charge up, and then they distribute energy slowly, over time.

Ultracapacitors can be charged very quickly, in seconds, and discharge quickly, but, today, they can’t store very much electrical energy.

The development of stable and cheaper ultracapacitors could be a key step in using wind or solar-generated power, especially if researchers will find ways to enable capacitors to store energy longer, that is not yet possible.

Even with their current storage capacity, the graphene devices could provide quick energy when needed in certain situations on the environmentally friendly way.

They can be used, as an example, to absorb the heat generated in braking an automobile or train, and store it for a short time, and then use it for the electrical needs of the vehicle (i.e. starting the vehicle or acceleration)

About the Author – Sophia H. Walker writes for the solar powered battery charger blog, her personal hobby blog related to tips to help people save electricity using solar energy for small gadgets.

,

No Comments

Microsoft KIN is dead, long live Windows Phone 7

And so ends Microsoft’s brief spell as a phone manufacturer. The company has just announced that it’s terminating its KIN line and focusing all of its resources on the development of their upcoming Windows Phone 7 OS.

Here comes the official statement:

“Microsoft has made the decision to focus on the Windows Phone 7 launch and will not ship KIN in Europe this fall as planned. Additionally, we are integrating our KIN team with the Windows Phone 7 team, incorporating valuable ideas and technologies from KIN into future Windows Phone releases. We will continue to work with Verizon in the U.S. to sell current KIN phones.”

So the KIN duo never lived to see it GSM-supporting versions become available. It only made it to Verizon’s CDMA network in the US (where it has been available for just under two months), but its sales didn’t even reach 10 000 units milestone.

After that and the universally negative reviews that the KIN handsets got after their release it’s hardly a surprise that Microsoft decided to give up on it. When you spend so much time and effort (and mostly so much money) and you end up with a product often described as one of the biggest flops in history, simply giving up seems the right thing to do.

Trying to bring the project back on the right track would be a really demanding task (if at all possible with so much catching up to do) and Microsoft simply cannot afford to waste resources on it. Not with the Windows Mobile OS market share dropping into irrelevance and its future hanging by a thread.

With the fierce competition from Android and iOS, Windows Phone 7 has to be (close to) perfect to regain some of the past glory of the Microsoft smartphone platforms. So if dropping the KINs is what needs to be done to make it perfect, we wholeheartedly support the Redmond-based company on this decision.

But they should know that now that they’ve put all their eggs in the WP7 basket a failure will basically make them the next big company to exit the smartphone market. It will be pretty interesting to see how this one unfolds.

Source


,

No Comments

Apple finds iPhone 4 signal bars misleading, hiding poor signal

Apple just issued their official statement on the non-existent iPhone 4 reception issues. What iPhone 4 users are experiencing when they grip the lower left corner is just their real signal, poor as it seems. Their poor signal has so far been obscured by the deceptive signal bars, which obviously tend to exaggerate the signal levels due to some erroneous formula in the iPhone software.

Apple’s statement on the iPhone 4 reception issues (which they previously dismissed as nonexistent), says that all phones have issues in areas of poor signal and it’s just that the iPhones show the available signal in a wrong way. Apple plans to fix that with a software release that should make graphical representation of available signal more real. End of problem.

We’ve seen examples of Apple’s hypocrisy many times but this is just too much. To treat millions of customers who paid big money to have your latest product as a flock of sheep is just outrageous.

How on Earth could an erroneous signal indicator be the reason for dropped calls/reduced data rates? And what is that magical firmware that will bend the laws of physics and improve the iPhone 4 reception when you are holding it… you know… the way you’ve been holding every other phone you’ve owned so far?

Apple also dares take a hit at other phones (Motorola, Nokia and RIM) for losing some signal strength when held in a specific way. This is true, of course, but much like Apple’s statement that “iPhone 4 makes video calls a reality”, the implied by this one is ridiculous in much the same way. No other handset loses as much signal when held in a natural way, let alone drop calls because of this.

So yeah, thanks for the effort Apple, but no thanks.

For a good laugh you can follow the source link and read Apple’s full statement.

Source

,

No Comments

Google releases Froyo update for Nexus Ones, open-sources code

Google is also celebrating today – Android 2.2 Froyo has reached two important milestones. Google open sourced the latest version and they are pushing out the final Froyo update to Nexus One users. And we’re sure the timing has nothing to do with the launch of the iPhone 4.

Sure, Froyo has been available to Nexus One users for a while (mostly on dev phones and through manual updates), but this seems to be the final, official version of Android 2.2. You could manually download the update from here (it works only if you’re running FRF50 firmware), though if you don’t know what you’re doing, you should wait for the OTA update.

Your Nexus One should automatically check for updates or you could force a check (go to Settings -> About phone -> System updates), so one way or another you should be getting a notification that a new version is available and download it Over-the-Air.

Some people are reporting that the update is not available for them yet, so it might not work right away – rolling out updates is a gradual process and it varies by location too.

The other important milestone for Android 2.2 Froyo is that Google open-sourced the code to their partners and manufacturers and everyone else too. This means that they can start working on Froyo firmwares for the non-Google phones.

Source: AndroidAndMeGoogle Blog

,

No Comments

What’s the big deal about the microSIM?

If SIM cards could talk, we’d imagine them to have few words. After all, they are ubiquitous yet universally forgotten most of the time, toiling away quietly in every mobile phone to provide us with the means to communicate with the rest of the world. As if to remind us of its importance, the Apple iPad has for a few moments cast some deserving attention on this unsung hero. Enter the microSIM, a name coined by Apple, which is about half the size of current SIM cards.

To understand this better, we spoke to Jean-Louis Carrara, vice president for Business Development at the Telecommunications unit from Gemalto North America, in an email interview recently.

How many types of SIM cards are available in the market today?

SIM cards refer to a generic term that actually includes many different product families. The first basic families are SIM (for 2G and some 3G networks), the RUIMs (for CDMA networks) and UICCs (for 3G and LTE networks). These cards support multiple telecom applications and other applications like payment, transit, etc.

Each product family is then defined by the size of the memory made available to the telecom operator. They are usually 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 500KB, 700KB, etc.

Finally, SIM/UICC can be shipped in various form factors:

  • The universally known plug-in SIM (also known by its standard name 2FF);
  • The recently advertised microSIM, made famous thanks to the iPad (also known by its standard name 3FF);
  • The ones specific to the Machine-to-Machine harsh environments SMD (surface mount design) or socketable SIM that can withstand higher temperatures, humidity, and vibrations. In that category, the most common package is vqfn8 (with 8 PINs), but others are available as well;
  • Some in microSD form factors used today in unconnected mobile TV players.

How did the 3FF microSIM come about and what are its differences compared with the current 2FF SIM?

The 3FF came about a few years ago in the standardization as an answer to a concern from OEMs that the 2FF SIM was taking too much space for future devices.

Why did it take so long for 3FF to catch on?

It is the role of the standardization to prepare for the future. The need for a smaller SIM was identified ahead of the design requirements, which is better for the whole industry. Once the design requirements arise, all companies can look at what was already standardized and immediately converge toward a single rapidly workable solution. 3FF caught on when the design need appeared.

Are there any other devices that use the microSIM aside from the Apple iPad 3G?

Yes, in fact, the Lok8u device required microSIMs before Apple named the 3FF a microSIM.

What are the main advantages of the microSIM? Are there any tradeoffs in terms of capacity, functions, etc., due to its smaller size?

No, there are no tradeoffs in terms of capacity, functions, memory size, etc. The SIM/UICC chips are always smaller than the contact plate (the metallic area visible on the SIM), and the 3FF is still larger than the contact plate.

If I cut my current SIM card to match the size of the microSIM, will it work on the iPad?

This is not something we recommend because there are too many parameters that may prevent it from working. You will have to have support for the right radio in the SIM, your wireless service plan must be compatible with your new device, the network or device may have some specific constraint of which you are not aware, and you will have to be very precise in your cutting and not break the chip inside. This can easily turn into an expensive failed experiment.

Is it possible to have prepaid options for microSIM? Are there any barriers to that or is it purely a business strategy on the telco operators’ part?

Every plan can be associated with any form factor, including prepaid. These are distribution and provisioning decisions that each operator takes according to its market. SIM/UICC have successfully enabled all kinds of distribution models around the world and have always delivered strong security compared with other alternatives; that is why SIM/UICC are so prevalent in the wireless industry. Some operators distribute phones, others don’t and just distribute SIM/UICCs. Other operators subsidize all their phones, some sell one prepaid subscription with four SIMs to promote viral customer acquisition.

How are SIM cards locked to certain telco operators?

SIM cards are always owned by an operator and associated with that operator by their main identification, the IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identifier). The IMSI is a long number that contains the country of issuance and the mobile network code associated to that card. That’s how we can travel across the world, attach to a local network and that network immediately knows to contact our home network to authenticate us and authorize the international roaming service.

Do SIM cards have unique identifiers like phones?

Yes, SIM cards have unique identifiers–the IMSI (loaded in its memory), which is a network identifier, and the UICC-ID, which is usually printed on the plastic for easy visual identification.

What developments can we expect to see in the near future for SIM cards? More functions or perhaps higher memory capacities?

We’ve come a long way from the 2G SIM cards that were available only in credit card format, had just a one-size memory and could authenticate only on a 2G network. Today’s SIM/UICCs are truly IP-connected cryptographic devices. They communicate over HTTPS, authenticate us mutually to multiple types of networks, secure mobile TV systems, support payment, transit and other NFC applications, and are available in ever greater memory sizes and new and innovative form factors.

Who does Gemalto make 3FF microSIMs for and which carriers worldwide have adopted this type of SIM cards?

As the largest provider, Gemalto has already shipped SIM/UICCs in the 3FF form factor to dozens of carriers worldwide. The list remains confidential until the operators release these cards to the public.

By Damian Koh

1 Comment