Archive for category Palm

What’s the big deal about the microSIM?

If SIM cards could talk, we’d imagine them to have few words. After all, they are ubiquitous yet universally forgotten most of the time, toiling away quietly in every mobile phone to provide us with the means to communicate with the rest of the world. As if to remind us of its importance, the Apple iPad has for a few moments cast some deserving attention on this unsung hero. Enter the microSIM, a name coined by Apple, which is about half the size of current SIM cards.

To understand this better, we spoke to Jean-Louis Carrara, vice president for Business Development at the Telecommunications unit from Gemalto North America, in an email interview recently.

How many types of SIM cards are available in the market today?

SIM cards refer to a generic term that actually includes many different product families. The first basic families are SIM (for 2G and some 3G networks), the RUIMs (for CDMA networks) and UICCs (for 3G and LTE networks). These cards support multiple telecom applications and other applications like payment, transit, etc.

Each product family is then defined by the size of the memory made available to the telecom operator. They are usually 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 500KB, 700KB, etc.

Finally, SIM/UICC can be shipped in various form factors:

  • The universally known plug-in SIM (also known by its standard name 2FF);
  • The recently advertised microSIM, made famous thanks to the iPad (also known by its standard name 3FF);
  • The ones specific to the Machine-to-Machine harsh environments SMD (surface mount design) or socketable SIM that can withstand higher temperatures, humidity, and vibrations. In that category, the most common package is vqfn8 (with 8 PINs), but others are available as well;
  • Some in microSD form factors used today in unconnected mobile TV players.

How did the 3FF microSIM come about and what are its differences compared with the current 2FF SIM?

The 3FF came about a few years ago in the standardization as an answer to a concern from OEMs that the 2FF SIM was taking too much space for future devices.

Why did it take so long for 3FF to catch on?

It is the role of the standardization to prepare for the future. The need for a smaller SIM was identified ahead of the design requirements, which is better for the whole industry. Once the design requirements arise, all companies can look at what was already standardized and immediately converge toward a single rapidly workable solution. 3FF caught on when the design need appeared.

Are there any other devices that use the microSIM aside from the Apple iPad 3G?

Yes, in fact, the Lok8u device required microSIMs before Apple named the 3FF a microSIM.

What are the main advantages of the microSIM? Are there any tradeoffs in terms of capacity, functions, etc., due to its smaller size?

No, there are no tradeoffs in terms of capacity, functions, memory size, etc. The SIM/UICC chips are always smaller than the contact plate (the metallic area visible on the SIM), and the 3FF is still larger than the contact plate.

If I cut my current SIM card to match the size of the microSIM, will it work on the iPad?

This is not something we recommend because there are too many parameters that may prevent it from working. You will have to have support for the right radio in the SIM, your wireless service plan must be compatible with your new device, the network or device may have some specific constraint of which you are not aware, and you will have to be very precise in your cutting and not break the chip inside. This can easily turn into an expensive failed experiment.

Is it possible to have prepaid options for microSIM? Are there any barriers to that or is it purely a business strategy on the telco operators’ part?

Every plan can be associated with any form factor, including prepaid. These are distribution and provisioning decisions that each operator takes according to its market. SIM/UICC have successfully enabled all kinds of distribution models around the world and have always delivered strong security compared with other alternatives; that is why SIM/UICC are so prevalent in the wireless industry. Some operators distribute phones, others don’t and just distribute SIM/UICCs. Other operators subsidize all their phones, some sell one prepaid subscription with four SIMs to promote viral customer acquisition.

How are SIM cards locked to certain telco operators?

SIM cards are always owned by an operator and associated with that operator by their main identification, the IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identifier). The IMSI is a long number that contains the country of issuance and the mobile network code associated to that card. That’s how we can travel across the world, attach to a local network and that network immediately knows to contact our home network to authenticate us and authorize the international roaming service.

Do SIM cards have unique identifiers like phones?

Yes, SIM cards have unique identifiers–the IMSI (loaded in its memory), which is a network identifier, and the UICC-ID, which is usually printed on the plastic for easy visual identification.

What developments can we expect to see in the near future for SIM cards? More functions or perhaps higher memory capacities?

We’ve come a long way from the 2G SIM cards that were available only in credit card format, had just a one-size memory and could authenticate only on a 2G network. Today’s SIM/UICCs are truly IP-connected cryptographic devices. They communicate over HTTPS, authenticate us mutually to multiple types of networks, secure mobile TV systems, support payment, transit and other NFC applications, and are available in ever greater memory sizes and new and innovative form factors.

Who does Gemalto make 3FF microSIMs for and which carriers worldwide have adopted this type of SIM cards?

As the largest provider, Gemalto has already shipped SIM/UICCs in the 3FF form factor to dozens of carriers worldwide. The list remains confidential until the operators release these cards to the public.

By Damian Koh

1 Comment

0.facebook.com launched, cuts on data charges and loads faster

Facebook, together with over 50 mobile operators in 45 countries around the globe, have just launched the new website 0.facebook.com. It brings all the key features of Facebook to people’s mobile phones, loads fast and comes for free. Yeap, zero data charges! But there’s a tiny little catch.

More than 100 million people are using Facebook’s services from their mobile devices but now, a lot of them will be able to continue doing that without having to pay for data charges.

In order to browse the zero-charges 0.facebook.com site for free, you need to be a customer of one of the operators listed below. Be aware that the free deal is valid only as long as you don’t open images and don’t click links to other websites. Doing any of that is still a paid thing.

Luckily, each time when you’re about to leave 0.facebook.com or to open an image, a notification will appear on your phone’s screen reminding you of the additional data charges that might apply if you decide to proceed.

The other advantage of the 0.facebook.com is that it’s optimized for use on mobile devices. So, it loads fast. But it still packs all the major features users would find on the traditional m.facebook.com mobile site as well as on the touch-optimized variety at touch.facebook.com.

Using 0.facebook.com, you can update your status, view the news feed, comment on posts or “like” them, reply to messages or write new ones, leave messages on the walls of your friends. Well, once again, there are no photos to see here. Those are still only a click and ? few cents away (data charges apply for images).

P.S. It seems that entering zero.facebook.com instead of the numeral address does the same job of getting you to the new mobile page.

Source

, ,

No Comments

Video – Palm Pre Plus

,

1 Comment

HP acquires Palm, declares commitment to webOS

Surprise, surprise! Palm have been sold. It’s not like we didn’t see it coming but it just happened so quickly. Quite unexpectedly the highest bidder turned out to be HP. The quoted acquisition price stands at 1.2 billion US dollars.

There have been speculations on Palm’s future for a long time now (involving names like HTC, Lenovo, etc.) but the mystery has just been solved. HP decided to acquire Palm’s shares and paid 5.70 US dollars per share.

Now, they are good 1.2 billion US dollars behind and one still fresh and very promising OS ahead. The webOS (which we tried on the Palm Pre) still has plenty of unrevealed potential and HP have understandably declared their commitment to it.

Jon Rubinstein, the man who brought Palm back to life (then back to the counter and finally sold them), started his career at HP. He is still the CEO of Palm and is said to remain part of the company even after the acquisition.

And this is the letter to his team, the Palm employees, in which he shares with them the news and his excitement about it.

Source

, ,

No Comments

Bluetooth 4.0 specs get finalized, devices coming by year’s end

With Bluetooth 3.0 barely out the door, the Bluetooth SIG finalized the next version – Bluetooth 4.0. It builds on the previous version, but adds a new low power mode, which can be used by watches, training equipment and so on.

Bluetooth 3.0 brought high-speed transfers by piggy-backing on 802.11 technology and achieved maximum speeds of 24Mbps (vs. 3Mbps for 2.0 + EDR). Version 4.0 on the other hand is low-bandwidth, but low power enough to work on cell-button powered devices.

Use cases include sending Caller ID info to watches, data from pedometers, glucose monitors and so on without drying out the battery.

However, Bluetooth 4.0 incorporates classic Bluetooth, high-speed Bluetooth and low-power Bluetooth. According to the Bluetooth SIG, devices are now not limited to 10 meter range – ranges can go up to 60 meters.

Bluetooth 3.0 is not very popular among mobile phones right now, except for support in the odd Samsung, most new phones stick to 2.0 or 2.1 with Enhanced Data Rate (EDR).

The first Bluetooth 4.0 devices are expected to appear in late 2010 or early 2011. This could mean that mobile phones manufacturers will probably make the jump straight to Bluetooth 4.0 skipping ver. 3.0 altogether.

Source

,

No Comments